Mov Disord. Dec;20(12) International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): appropriate for studies of Friedreich’s ataxia? Cano SJ(1). The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) is an outcome measure that was created in by the Committee of the World Federation of. INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE ATAXIA RATING SCALE. I: POSTURE AND GAIT DISTURBANCE. SCORE: 1. WALKING. CAPACITIES observed during a 10 .

Author: Shagis Kagazshura
Country: Guinea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Software
Published (Last): 22 April 2004
Pages: 401
PDF File Size: 18.71 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.78 Mb
ISBN: 454-9-63715-573-4
Downloads: 65428
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mek

International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale – Physiopedia

The scale is made up of 8 items related to gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger-chase test, nose-finger test, fast alternating movements and heel-shin ivars.

The authors found no relationship between ICARS score and the severity of cardiac involvement or exercise performance, and the ICARS was found not to be a predictor for the severity of cardiac involvement.

Also, despite the fact that for MICONOS disease duration was derived from age at diagnosis and thus might underestimate disease duration, the rate was comparable with the other centres. Evidence for va- when item—total correlations corrected for overlap ex- lidity is essential for the accurate and meaningful inter- ceed 0.

For example, improvements in fine motor skills, swallowing, speech and upper limb ataxia have been specifically reported in open-label and placebo-controlled intervention studies Hausse et al. This study was supported by the Na- This study has several limitations.

The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. References Publications referenced by this paper. Sign In or Create an Account.

Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

Kufs or not Kufs: When refering to evidence in academic writing, you should always try to reference the primary original source. Summated rating scale construction: Psychometric analysis followed the general methodology on assessment of summated rating scales Spector,which was already applied by Cano et al. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. Showing of 29 references.


Neurological effects of high-dose idebenone in patients with Friedreich’s ataxia: The correlation coefficient between subscales ranged from 0. That is, items should correlate higher constructs to the ICARS, with which to compare its with the total score of their own subscale item— own- subscaleswe were limited ayaxia two basic types of validity scale correlation than with the total score of the other testing.

Development of a brief ataxia rating scale (BARS) based on a modified form of the ICARS.

Similar findings of different rates of predicted disease progression depending on age of onset were made previously in a smaller retrospective study Ribai et al. When completing the outcome measure each category is assessed and scored accordingly.

However, in light of the emerging picture that interpretation of potential therapeutic interventions might also be based on subscale data, as indicated earlier in the text, such adaptations of the subscale structure of the ICARS appear warranted for this disease. References Publications referenced by this paper. Measurement, in handbook of survey research.

Contents Editors Categories Share Cite. Development of guide version 1. Skip to search form Skip to main content. Wolinsky Annals of neurology Appropriate for studies of Friedreich’s ataxia? Boesch Journal of Neurology That is usually the journal article where the information was first stated.

Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) – Physiopedia

Third, our validity testing was limited, in part, by can be either clinician-based e. Stefanie RichterA. Evaluating neurological out- ;2: Inter-rater reliability and validity of two ataxia rating scales in children with brain tumours Heather HartleyBarry L.


Showing of 25 references. Multimodal imaging in familial FTLD: It is recommended that item—total to 9 monthsestimates the ability of a scale to produce correlations exceed 0. Likewise, we did not detect any obvious difference in the rate of change according to the geographical region from which patients were recruited Europe: Scores for the eight items range as follows:.

The GAA repeat length was available for of patients. Click here to sign up. Dissecting out migraine complexity through comprehensive analysis of allodynia.

The SARA is a tool for assessing ataxia. A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies Catherine J.

Assessment of neurological efficacy of idebenone in pediatric patients with Friedreich’s ataxia: Physiopedia articles are best used to find the original sources of information see the references list at the bottom of the article.

International cooperative ataxia rating scale for phar- Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: Qual Life Res 7. MIG Th1 chemokine in Vitiligo. Psychometric considerations in ; One general problem in planning and interpretation of clinical outcomes in rare diseases is the limited availability of reliable natural history data to adequately power prospective clinical trials.

First, our sample was icags.