Zahlen. In the introduction to this paper he points out that the real . In addition the recent work by R. Dedekind Was sind und was sollen. Donor challenge: Your generous donation will be matched 2-to-1 right now. Your $5 becomes $15! Dear Internet Archive Supporter,. I ask only. Dedekind Richard. What Are Numbers and What Should They Be?(Was Sind Und Was Sollen Die Zahlen?) Revised English Translation of 70½ 1 with Added .

Author: Gardasar Arashimuro
Country: New Zealand
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 14 May 2006
Pages: 85
PDF File Size: 5.44 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.47 Mb
ISBN: 954-7-51730-667-5
Downloads: 8950
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Maurn

Abbildung eines Systems in sich selbst; 5. He returned to Brunswick inwhere he became professor at the local university and taught until his retirement in Leon Henkin – – New York: Logicism and Structuralism 4.

Also, why did Dedekind insist on their use in the first place, since we seem to be able to do without them? As was customary, he also wrote a second dissertation Habilitationcompleted insolken after that of his colleague and friend Bernhard Riemann.

Request removal from index. If we look at Dedekind’s contributions from such a perspective, the sum total looks impressive.

Often all one gets, then, are platitudes: An initial, rough answer to that question is already contained in our discussion so far: Dedekind edited the collected works of Lejeune DirichletGaussand Riemann. Functions are to be conceived of extensionally too, as ways of correlating the elements of sets.

This led, at least in part, to Cantor’s further study of infinite cardinalities and to his discovery, soon thereafter, that the set of all real numbers is not countable. This thesis did not display the talent evident by Dedekind’s subsequent publications. He modified and expanded it several times, with a fourth edition published in Lejeune-DirichletDedekind However, the most problematic feature—and the one Dedekind came to take seriously himself—is a third one: In order to shed more light on them, it helps to turn to his other mathematical work, starting with dedekiind number theory.


Cambridge Library Collection – Mathematics: Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?

Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? What we get, overall, is the long missing unified criterion of identity for rational and irrational numbers, both of which are now treated as elements in an encompassing number system isomorphic to, but distinct from, the system of cuts.

Each theory had a strong influence on later developments—Dedekind’s by shaping the approaches to modern algebra field theory, ring theory, etc. Boolosamong others: Beyond just calling Dedekind’s approach set-theoretic, infinitary, and non-constructive, the methodology that informs it can be analyzed as consisting of three parts.

Divisor XollenBoston: Vieweg; later German version of Dedekind a.

Was Sind Und Was Sollen Die Zahlen?

Finally, in the further development of set theory during the twentieth century it became clear that several of Dedekind’s results and corresponding procedures can be generalized in important ways.

Royce Et Fie, Critiques de Bradley. Once more we start with desekind infinite system, here that of all the natural numbers, and new number systems are constructed out of it set-theoretically although the full power set is not needed in those cases.


What was called for, then, was a unified treatment of discrete and continuous quantities. Russell’s paradox Suslin’s problem Burali-Forti paradox.

Richard Dedekind – Wikipedia

The crucial issue, or the linchpin, for him was the notion of continuity. Addition der Zahlen; This principle ought to be adhered to not so much because it increases certainty; rather, it is often only by providing an explicit, detailed proof for a result that the assumptions on which it depends become evident and, thus, its range of applicability established. We already saw that Dedekind presents the notion of set, together with those of object and function, as fundamental for human thought.

Dedekind’s approach is set-theoretic and infinitary, while Kronecker’s is constructivist and finitary. The core of the procedure just described is the following: For the 16th-century humanist, see Friedrich Dedekind.

Dedekind, Richard – Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?

Volume 3 Karl Weierstrass. What it dei to be simply infinite can now be captured in four conditions: We reviewed his innovative approaches to the natural and real numbers; we also reconsidered his role in the rise of modern set theory. This entry has no external links.